They confirmed that the SDXL weights won’t be released, and they’re probably going to do the same for the training code as well:
https://github.com/TencentQQGYLab/ELLA/issues/16#issuecomment-2046795891
I’m not being a cynic, but I’ve been in academia long enough to know how people (usually early in career) tend to (heavy stress on “tend to”) value the publication itself rather attempting to make its results readily or even generally available. I’ll even go far enough to say that this implies “things” as well.
The results and descriptions in the paper quite exclusively involve SDXL, yet the weights released are SD1.5. Furthermore, training code itself hasn’t been released either and quite likely won’t ever see the light ofof day. There’s something about making a publicized and documented claim which couldn’t have been achieved without PoC/evidence, and then scaling back on said claims and deliverables.
I get the weights being “a piece of investment” that’s being out “for free”, but the training code itself? Maybe I’m being a cynic, but just thought I’d let you all know that LaviBridge/ELLA’s route for prompt-adherence in SDXL, is probably dead – better to look to SD3 now, I think.
submitted by /u/hexinx
[link] [comments]
Neural contextual biasing allows speech recognition models to leverage contextually relevant information, leading to improved…
Today we are announcing the general availability of Amazon Bedrock Prompt Management, with new features…
The rise of Natural Language Processing (NLP) combined with traditional Structured Query Language (SQL) has…
Through his wealth and cultural influence, Elon Musk undoubtedly strengthened the Trump campaign. WIRED unpacks…
The growing use of artificial intelligence (AI)-based models is placing greater demands on the electronics…
This post is co-written with Steven Craig from Hearst. To maintain their competitive edge, organizations…