They confirmed that the SDXL weights won’t be released, and they’re probably going to do the same for the training code as well:
https://github.com/TencentQQGYLab/ELLA/issues/16#issuecomment-2046795891
I’m not being a cynic, but I’ve been in academia long enough to know how people (usually early in career) tend to (heavy stress on “tend to”) value the publication itself rather attempting to make its results readily or even generally available. I’ll even go far enough to say that this implies “things” as well.
The results and descriptions in the paper quite exclusively involve SDXL, yet the weights released are SD1.5. Furthermore, training code itself hasn’t been released either and quite likely won’t ever see the light ofof day. There’s something about making a publicized and documented claim which couldn’t have been achieved without PoC/evidence, and then scaling back on said claims and deliverables.
I get the weights being “a piece of investment” that’s being out “for free”, but the training code itself? Maybe I’m being a cynic, but just thought I’d let you all know that LaviBridge/ELLA’s route for prompt-adherence in SDXL, is probably dead – better to look to SD3 now, I think.
submitted by /u/hexinx
[link] [comments]
Hey, I found a pretty cool way to keep locations consistent across generations. I took…
The price of anything with memory is skyrocketing thanks to AI. Aging streaming devices are…
Anyone knows what could've been used here? Which model generates such photorealism? I've been using…
Multilingual self-supervised speech models can benefit from sharing information across languages, but under a matched…
What Hiring Managers value — and how they’ve built their careers at PalantirEditor’s Note: Technical Recruiter Rachel Vogel…
Checking tens of thousands of apartment leases against constantly changing state landlord-tenant laws, and proving…