They confirmed that the SDXL weights won’t be released, and they’re probably going to do the same for the training code as well:
https://github.com/TencentQQGYLab/ELLA/issues/16#issuecomment-2046795891
I’m not being a cynic, but I’ve been in academia long enough to know how people (usually early in career) tend to (heavy stress on “tend to”) value the publication itself rather attempting to make its results readily or even generally available. I’ll even go far enough to say that this implies “things” as well.
The results and descriptions in the paper quite exclusively involve SDXL, yet the weights released are SD1.5. Furthermore, training code itself hasn’t been released either and quite likely won’t ever see the light ofof day. There’s something about making a publicized and documented claim which couldn’t have been achieved without PoC/evidence, and then scaling back on said claims and deliverables.
I get the weights being “a piece of investment” that’s being out “for free”, but the training code itself? Maybe I’m being a cynic, but just thought I’d let you all know that LaviBridge/ELLA’s route for prompt-adherence in SDXL, is probably dead – better to look to SD3 now, I think.
submitted by /u/hexinx
[link] [comments]
In this article, you will learn the seven architectural components that separate a production-grade agentic…
While UMAP is widely used for exploring high-dimensional data, typical workflows focus on its lower-dimensional…
Authors: Ying Li, Arjun Rao, Shradha SehgalIntroductionRecommendations sit at the heart of the Netflix experience. Our…
Open weight models have become powerful enough to handle complex tasks such as multi-step agentic…
In today’s agentic era, modern cloud applications are evolving from a set of passive tools…
In a review triggered by OpenAI’s Hugging Face incident, Anthropic discovered three of its AI…