Categories: FAANG

Reinforced Agent: Inference-Time Feedback for Tool-Calling Agents

This paper was accepted at the Fifth Workshop on Natural Language Generation, Evaluation, and Metrics at ACL 2026.
Tool-calling agents are evaluated on tool selection, parameter accuracy, and scope recognition, yet LLM trajectory assessments remain inherently post-hoc. Disconnected from the active execution loop, such assessments identify errors that are usually addressed through prompt-tuning or retraining, and fundamentally cannot course-correct the agent in real time. To close this gap, we move evaluation into the execution loop at inference time: a specialized reviewer agent evaluates…
AI Generated Robotic Content

Recent Posts

7 Async Patterns for Running Agents Concurrently in Python

In this article, you will learn seven async patterns for running AI agents concurrently in…

21 hours ago

Accelerate cyber defense with OpenAI and AWS: Daybreak Red & Daybreak Blue now available to eligible customers on Amazon Bedrock

Cyber defenders have never had more capability at their fingertips, and they have never needed…

21 hours ago

Looker’s semantic layer governs Gemini Enterprise data for user trust

For organizations deploying AI agents at scale, there’s often a critical divide between structured and…

21 hours ago

Is It Safe to Eat Lettuce Yet?

“That product is off the market, so I think there’s absolutely lower risk for cyclospora…

22 hours ago

Today’s downloads predict tomorrow’s scientific impact—up to five years out

The trail of likes, shares and downloads we leave across the internet could help predict…

22 hours ago

Prompt Caching vs. Fine-Tuning: A Cost and Latency Decision Framework

In this article, you will learn how prompt caching and fine-tuning differ as strategies for…

2 days ago