Categories: FAANG

Self-reflective Uncertainties: Do LLMs Know Their Internal Answer Distribution?

This paper was accepted at the Workshop on Reliable and Responsible Foundation Models (RRFMs) Workshop at ICML 2025.
Uncertainty quantification plays a pivotal role when bringing large language models (LLMs) to end-users. Its primary goal is that an LLM should indicate when it is unsure about an answer it gives. While this has been revealed with numerical certainty scores in the past, we propose to use the rich output space of LLMs, the space of all possible strings, to give a string that describes the uncertainty. In particular, we seek a string that describes the distribution of LLM answers…
AI Generated Robotic Content

Recent Posts

pgvector vs. Dedicated Vector Databases: A Production Benchmark

Run this on a typical laptop and both systems will report latencies in the low…

15 mins ago

Beyond the KV cache: Training and serving i14’s Laplace 3B linear attention model on AWS Trainium2 with native PyTorch

Most large language models (LLMs) use transformer architectures with softmax attention. During inference, their key-value…

16 mins ago

Claude Opus 5.5 and Claude Sonnet 5.5 are now available in Google Antigravity

Whether you are iterating on a quick bug fix or planning a complex migration, different…

16 mins ago

A New Rocco Smart Fridge Just Dropped. So Did the Prices (2026)

Save $100 on the new Essential or $200 on the original, and give your holiday…

1 hour ago

Brain-inspired randomness makes artificial vision more reliable

Humans are usually remarkably good at recognizing objects, even under poor conditions. Artificial vision systems,…

1 hour ago

Descriptors and Controlled Attributes in Python

In this article, you will learn what Python descriptors are and how to use them…

1 day ago